Ethics News

image image image image image image
The ADA Code of Ethics, Organized Dentistry's Gag Rule The ADA's Code of Professional Conduct states: "Based on available scientific data, the ADA has determined that the removal of amalgam restorations from the non-allergic patient for the alleged purpose of removing toxic substances from the body, when such treatment is performed solely at the recommendation or suggestion of the dentist, is improper and unethical."
Dr. Wayne Myles Punished for Warning About "The Failing Amalgam" in the Washington Post Dr. Wayne Myles from Herndon, Virginia received a letter from the Board of Dentistry accusing him of making false, misleading and deceptive advertising claims by publishing an article called "The Failing Amalgam" in a supplement to the Washington Post called "Dentalife.
Dental mercury amalgam disclosure and informed consent Dr. Michael D. Fleming currently serves as the Consumer Representative on the Dental Products Panel at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the FDA and has served on two separate hearings on the safety of dental amalgam in 2006 and 2010. In this video he expresses his views on the need for informed consent in regards to dental mercury amalgam fillings.
Crushing blow to ADA gag rule: federal judge rules for Breiner A federal judge in Connecticut has ordered the state of Connecticut to stop harassing Dr. Mark Breiner for criticizing mercury amalgam fillings. Breiner may now advertise and advocate mercury-free dentistry in any public forum, and state why they are such a horrid health risk. The case was decided in First Amendment grounds. 
An Uncertain Risk and an Uncertain Future: Assessing the Legal Implications of Mercury Amalgam Fillings Although a patient is legally entitled to information regarding the risks and benefits of proposed and alternative treatments, the ADA and state dental boards have vehemently resisted informing patients about the risks of mercury amalgams and have been disciplining dentists who advocate against mercury amalgams.
Amalgam Fillings: Do Dental Patients Have a Right to Informed Consent? Legal implications for dentists using the amalgam fillings are mounting. Evidence of amalgam toxicity and the availability of safer alternative materials, arguably, substantially increases the liability of the ADA and pro-amalgam dentists. One attorney has predicted that mass tort litigation from amalgam poisonings will soon become a "major courtroom event

Follow us on:

facebooktwitteryoutubepodcast_logo4


Search Mercury Exposure

Lawsuits

Crushing blow to ADA gag rule: federal judge rules for Breiner

Consumers for Dental Choice

gavel-02A federal judge in Connecticut has ordered the state of Connecticut to stop harassing Dr. Mark Breiner for criticizing mercury amalgam fillings. Breiner may now advertise and advocate mercury-free dentistry in any public forum, and state why they are such a horrid health risk. The case was decided in First Amendment grounds. 

Read 1506 times
Published in Lawsuits

MERCURY DOCUMENTARY

Featured Ethics Videos

You must have the Adobe Flash Player installed to view this player.

Past Ethics Posts